This study examined changes in the intentions, attitudes and beliefs of farmers regarding their use of gene technology. Of 656 respondents to a postal survey in 2000, the views of 115 were assessed again in 2002. These follow up respondents indicated their intention to use gene technology, attitudes toward using gene technology and beliefs about market acceptance, commercial viability and environmental risk from using the technology. Results from this comparative study show how farmers' thinking about gene technology may have changed but they are not necessarily a good indication of New Zealand farmers and growers views in 2002 (this topic is covered in AERU Report No.258).After two years, attitudes and intentions to use gene technology had undergone a minor, non-significant, change towards more positive intentions to use the technology. However, some significant shifts had occurred. These farmers and growers were found to be less supportive of New Zealand becoming GE free. In addition, they thought it less likely that gene technology would cause damage to ecological systems and endanger public health. It was also thought more likely that economic growth would occur from using gene technology, and that using gene technology would increase food production. Overall only a minor change in farmer response was found to have occurred over the two-year period between measurements. Nevertheless, results showed a link between the consequences of using gene technology and farmer and grower attitudes and intentions. Consequently, prospects for change in attitudes and beliefs about the consequences of using gene technology are discussed as key determining factors in farmer and grower decisions regarding their use of gene technology.